Choose either “Effective cause” or “Design” argument for the existence of god presented by Aquinas.

Choose either the ‘Effective cause’ or the ‘Design’ argument for the existence of god presented by “Aquinas”. Explain the argument and how it is supposed to prove God’s existence, using examples to demonstrate the principles/premises when needed. Then criticize the argument and point out where it might fail as a proof, using counter-examples.

Choose one of the arguments to critique, not both of them. Since these arguments are very simple in their structure you will need to take sufficient time to fully explain the major premise in the argument, and then be very complete in your criticism of it.

Also realize that i am not asking you to argue for or against God’s existence but rather to critique a particular argument.