|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Content
|
| 60.0 to >48.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of relevant course concepts and appropriately applies the concepts to the identified operational issues.
|
48.0 to >36.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
36.0 to >24.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
24.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
60.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Requirements
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
The Portfolio includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
The Portfolio includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
The Portfolio includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
20.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
The Portfolio includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Critical Analysis
|
| 50.0 to >40.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.
|
40.0 to >30.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.
|
30.0 to >20.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second and third-order effects.
|
20.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis of the identified operational issues; identifies contributing factors and considers second- and third-order effects.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
50.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Sources
|
| 30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least six credible sources.
|
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates three to five credible sources.
|
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates one or two credible source.
|
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates no credible sources.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent, Research, and Analysis: Application of Source Material
|
| 30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue; knowledge from the course linked properly to source material.
|
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems with selection and linkage of sources.
|
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source selection is seriously flawed; no linkage to knowledge from the course.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Organization
|
| 30.0 to >24.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized and well written for a presentation format. Conforms to project requirements.
|
24.0 to >18.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing; is in proper presentation format. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.
|
18.0 to >12.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in organization and writing; does not completely follow presentation format. Does not conform to project requirements in a significant way.
|
12.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not well organized or well written and is not in proper presentation format. Does not conform to project requirements.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
30.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Grammar and Style
|
| 25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.
|
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.
|
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.
|
10.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and Writing: Demonstrates proper use of APA style.
|
| 25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.
|
20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.
|
10.0 to >0.0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.
|
0.0 pts
No Description
No Submission
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 300.0
|
